ToiletClown | |
|
Hi,
I've tried to line up 3 formations as I'd like to see where my players are best positioned. Problem is, even though I submitted 3 formation line ups: one for the first 20 minutes, one for the following 20 minutes and one for the last 20 minutes, The third line up never appeared on the field!
Result was that some of my players didn't play and that the 2nd formation (which is my weakest) played for 40 minutes. This isn't the first time this happened, but uptil now I didn't had any "solid" proof. I did gave the order to change to formation one and two at respectively 20 minutes and 40 minutes, as I also set this formation as my default!
Could this be checked and fixed please, since it's very annoying to try and implement a strategy this way.
Kind regards,
ToiletClown |
|
|
Draugr | |
|
Because of priorities in the game engine you have to play starting formation, formation 2 at 20+ minutes and formation 1 at 40+ minutes. THen it will work.
If both formation 1 and 2 are told to play, as in your case, it will send formation 1. |
|
|
Artoupan | |
|
Yes because if you say "play Form1 at 20 minutes+ if any score", and "play Form2 at 40 minutes+ if any score", when arrives the 20 minutes, engine will change for the Form1, but when arrives the 40 minutes, engine will check, Form1 is told 20minutes+ at anyscore, it still apply, I don't need to change. It's the "+" who is important ! |
|
|
ToiletClown | |
|
Well that makes sense. So basicly there is no way to have 3 formations played in one match, unless you know how the score is going to be?
|
|
|
Draugr | |
|
THere is, jsut do as I say
Set formation 2 at 20+ minutes
Set formation 1 at 40+ minutes
Now after 20 minutes you will get formation 2 in. At 40 minutes, it will find both formation 1 and 2 to meet the criteria, and then it chooses formation 1 as a default, so you get the desired change again. |
Last edited on 2010-03-09 at 18:57 |
|
[THB] Admin | |
|
ToiletClown wrote:
Hi,
I've tried to line up 3 formations as I'd like to see where my players are best positioned. Problem is, even though I submitted 3 formation line ups: one for the first 20 minutes, one for the following 20 minutes and one for the last 20 minutes, The third line up never appeared on the field!
Result was that some of my players didn't play and that the 2nd formation (which is my weakest) played for 40 minutes. This isn't the first time this happened, but uptil now I didn't had any "solid" proof. I did gave the order to change to formation one and two at respectively 20 minutes and 40 minutes, as I also set this formation as my default!
Could this be checked and fixed please, since it's very annoying to try and implement a strategy this way.
Kind regards,
ToiletClown |
This is a probably a case of overlapping instructions. Write down exactly how you set your orders and we'll check it out. |
|
|
ToiletClown | |
|
Administrator wrote:
This is a probably a case of overlapping instructions. Write down exactly how you set your orders and we'll check it out. |
Starting formation: at the start of the game
Formation one: any score at 20+ minutes
formation two: any score at 40+ minutes |
|
|
PStimpel | |
|
Pls check this
http://www.teamhb.org/index.php?page=community&subpage=viewt&t=36&start=10
the 5th post on this page
This is not a bug, you just need to sort the things a bit reverse. If formation 2 and formation 1 are valid at the same time formation 1 gets the priority.
Standardformation over formation 1 over formation 2
It is not a bug, just not described in a good way |
|
|
ToiletClown | |
|
PStimpel wrote:
Pls check this
http://www.teamhb.org/index.php?page=community&subpage=viewt&t=36&start=10
the 5th post on this page
This is not a bug, you just need to sort the things a bit reverse. If formation 2 and formation 1 are valid at the same time formation 1 gets the priority.
Standardformation over formation 1 over formation 2
It is not a bug, just not described in a good way |
Got it to work today. used formation 2 at 20+ and formation 1 at 40+ |
|
|
PStimpel | |
|
ToiletClown wrote:
PStimpel wrote:
Pls check this
http://www.teamhb.org/index.php?page=community&subpage=viewt&t=36&start=10
the 5th post on this page
This is not a bug, you just need to sort the things a bit reverse. If formation 2 and formation 1 are valid at the same time formation 1 gets the priority.
Standardformation over formation 1 over formation 2
It is not a bug, just not described in a good way |
Got it to work today. used formation 2 at 20+ and formation 1 at 40+ |
Exactly! |
|
|
|