| Sffc95 |  |
 |
Sorry Boss...
As Peter said, It's an training injury.
You got unlucky. But Admins are looking over injury probability |
|
|
| PStimpel | |
|
| Don't make the mistake to think they will cancel injuries! Injuries are important part if this game concept...they work on the percentage of injuries - thats all |
|
|
| Sffc95 | |
|
Injury probability, that's what I said
The probability of an injury to happen |
|
|
| cuews | |
|
|
| Draugr | |
|
I disagree with lowering injury percentages. On the 7 starting players, with 2.5% on each player, that still means only one average injury per 6 weeks. Suppose the average time that an injury lasts to be two weeks. This means that on average, msot of the time, there will be no injuries amongst them, and when there is, they're very likely the only one.
The chance of having both the goalkeepers injured the same week is about 1 in 400, so will happen average one week in 8 years...and this is if we have minimum medic installations! Those who are terrified about this prospect can choose to upgrade their medical staff and be rid of the problem.
|
|
|
| Artoupan | |
|
| You're not completly wrong... |
|
|
| PStimpel | |
|
Draugr wrote:
I disagree with lowering injury percentages. On the 7 starting players, with 2.5% on each player, that still means only one average injury per 6 weeks. Suppose the average time that an injury lasts to be two weeks. This means that on average, msot of the time, there will be no injuries amongst them, and when there is, they're very likely the only one.
The chance of having both the goalkeepers injured the same week is about 1 in 400, so will happen average one week in 8 years...and this is if we have minimum medic installations! Those who are terrified about this prospect can choose to upgrade their medical staff and be rid of the problem.
|
We asked for lowering the percentage at least at the start, since we had 2 and more injured guys out of 9 or 11. Once a team has a bigger roster the injuries aren't a problem. Therefor I agree with you on disagreeing. |
|
|
| Oddball | |
|
im still out on this, i agree injuries are part of the game and needed.
but i think the difference between the percentage for avg and high is too small. also the fact i got annoyed by picking up 3 in 3 weeks on average sort of destroyed my team for a while. never wanted the injuries removed just had to work harder to win with my rookies. |
|
|
| Sffc95 | |
|
PStimpel wrote:
Draugr wrote:
I disagree with lowering injury percentages. On the 7 starting players, with 2.5% on each player, that still means only one average injury per 6 weeks. Suppose the average time that an injury lasts to be two weeks. This means that on average, msot of the time, there will be no injuries amongst them, and when there is, they're very likely the only one.
The chance of having both the goalkeepers injured the same week is about 1 in 400, so will happen average one week in 8 years...and this is if we have minimum medic installations! Those who are terrified about this prospect can choose to upgrade their medical staff and be rid of the problem.
|
We asked for lowering the percentage at least at the start, since we had 2 and more injured guys out of 9 or 11. Once a team has a bigger roster the injuries aren't a problem. Therefor I agree with you on disagreeing. |
Hummm... touching phrase (really).
But he's right tough, people should upgrade medical staff... |
|
|
| PStimpel | |
|
Sffc95 wrote:
PStimpel wrote:
Draugr wrote:
I disagree with lowering injury percentages. On the 7 starting players, with 2.5% on each player, that still means only one average injury per 6 weeks. Suppose the average time that an injury lasts to be two weeks. This means that on average, msot of the time, there will be no injuries amongst them, and when there is, they're very likely the only one.
The chance of having both the goalkeepers injured the same week is about 1 in 400, so will happen average one week in 8 years...and this is if we have minimum medic installations! Those who are terrified about this prospect can choose to upgrade their medical staff and be rid of the problem.
|
We asked for lowering the percentage at least at the start, since we had 2 and more injured guys out of 9 or 11. Once a team has a bigger roster the injuries aren't a problem. Therefor I agree with you on disagreeing. |
Hummm... touching phrase (really).
But he's right tough, people should upgrade medical staff... |
Of course, but at the start you will not buy medical staff, you simply have no money for them. This is why starting teams shoul have a lower injury percentage to help them starting. I know this is not like in RL, but after all it is game, and it should be funny, not "mission impossible" to match real life. |
|
|
|
