Hot matches next week
Forum index >> TeamHB discussions >> Hot matches next week Goto page : 1, 2
 
Posted on 2010-03-15 16:47:40   
viktor
Posts: 145
Oddball wrote:

well it was a great game, big rollercoaster. but it has left a lot of questions about the game engine overall for me. i dont understand how i can go down by 8 points in the first half against a 6-0 def and my jumpshot offence, then come back to 1 down using a dribbling offence to lose by 4 overall. i dont see any consistency with any formation or tactic which is making me question continuing playing. at the moment the way i see it teams that managed to grap a top div title or cup and got a cash bonus will be dominant for a while to come. the better players is all that is needed and tactics mean nothing!

svedlana good game



(hmm 6-0D vs jumpshot and 6-0D vs jumpshot => better skilled players
6-3 in the last 10 minutes(better players under pressure?).

The formations just give you a better chance of winning. If chumps stopped a good set of players just because they were in the right formation, it d b a killjoy, wouldnt it mayte

Posted on 2010-03-15 17:33:13   
Oddball
Posts: 0
viktor wrote:

Oddball wrote:

well it was a great game, big rollercoaster. but it has left a lot of questions about the game engine overall for me. i dont understand how i can go down by 8 points in the first half against a 6-0 def and my jumpshot offence, then come back to 1 down using a dribbling offence to lose by 4 overall. i dont see any consistency with any formation or tactic which is making me question continuing playing. at the moment the way i see it teams that managed to grap a top div title or cup and got a cash bonus will be dominant for a while to come. the better players is all that is needed and tactics mean nothing!

svedlana good game



(hmm 6-0D vs jumpshot and 6-0D vs jumpshot => better skilled players
6-3 in the last 10 minutes(better players under pressure?).

The formations just give you a better chance of winning. If chumps stopped a good set of players just because they were in the right formation, it d b a killjoy, wouldnt it mayte



my concern is not better skilled players, which i knew his team had. it was more the issue of second half playing 5-1 dribble which is bad against 6-0 afaik or the FAQ states but still claw back to 1. Oh and if chump teams as u put it cant help their team with tactics then wot is the point!?! u expect the damage but like to minimise it with tactic, isn't that the whole point of them?!

so train speed strength and stamina, then put your team on constant fast break 6-0 jump and see who keeps up.

Posted on 2010-03-15 18:26:46   
viktor
Posts: 145
Oddball wrote:

viktor wrote:

Oddball wrote:

well it was a great game, big rollercoaster. but it has left a lot of questions about the game engine overall for me. i dont understand how i can go down by 8 points in the first half against a 6-0 def and my jumpshot offence, then come back to 1 down using a dribbling offence to lose by 4 overall. i dont see any consistency with any formation or tactic which is making me question continuing playing. at the moment the way i see it teams that managed to grap a top div title or cup and got a cash bonus will be dominant for a while to come. the better players is all that is needed and tactics mean nothing!

svedlana good game



(hmm 6-0D vs jumpshot and 6-0D vs jumpshot => better skilled players
6-3 in the last 10 minutes(better players under pressure?).

The formations just give you a better chance of winning. If chumps stopped a good set of players just because they were in the right formation, it d b a killjoy, wouldnt it mayte



my concern is not better skilled players, which i knew his team had. it was more the issue of second half playing 5-1 dribble which is bad against 6-0 afaik or the FAQ states but still claw back to 1. Oh and if chump teams as u put it cant help their team with tactics then wot is the point!?! u expect the damage but like to minimise it with tactic, isn't that the whole point of them?!

so train speed strength and stamina, then put your team on constant fast break 6-0 jump and see who keeps up.




From wat i remember, you were down 6 at haftime
and u had a 6-3 run in the last 10 minutes (which is governed more by nerves than formations apparently.
My bad, the loss from 30-50th minute was not as big as i thot it was


The other thing that stood out was him having a better team but a slightly bigger stamina loss than your team

PS: BTW I wasn't talking about your team against his team (during the chump/good team argument)

Posted on 2010-03-16 11:33:24   
Oddball
Posts: 0
viktor wrote:

Oddball wrote:

viktor wrote:

Oddball wrote:

well it was a great game, big rollercoaster. but it has left a lot of questions about the game engine overall for me. i dont understand how i can go down by 8 points in the first half against a 6-0 def and my jumpshot offence, then come back to 1 down using a dribbling offence to lose by 4 overall. i dont see any consistency with any formation or tactic which is making me question continuing playing. at the moment the way i see it teams that managed to grap a top div title or cup and got a cash bonus will be dominant for a while to come. the better players is all that is needed and tactics mean nothing!

svedlana good game



(hmm 6-0D vs jumpshot and 6-0D vs jumpshot => better skilled players
6-3 in the last 10 minutes(better players under pressure?).

The formations just give you a better chance of winning. If chumps stopped a good set of players just because they were in the right formation, it d b a killjoy, wouldnt it mayte



my concern is not better skilled players, which i knew his team had. it was more the issue of second half playing 5-1 dribble which is bad against 6-0 afaik or the FAQ states but still claw back to 1. Oh and if chump teams as u put it cant help their team with tactics then wot is the point!?! u expect the damage but like to minimise it with tactic, isn't that the whole point of them?!

so train speed strength and stamina, then put your team on constant fast break 6-0 jump and see who keeps up.




From wat i remember, you were down 6 at haftime
and u had a 6-3 run in the last 10 minutes (which is governed more by nerves than formations apparently.
My bad, the loss from 30-50th minute was not as big as i thot it was


The other thing that stood out was him having a better team but a slightly bigger stamina loss than your team

PS: BTW I wasn't talking about your team against his team (during the chump/good team argument)



critism is always taken positively if it help me understand things a little if i missed them. the stam loss on his team i will put down to he was probably fast breaking a lot or that can be my only assumption.

if i didn't lose then i wouldn't know if i was doing things wrong or right.
Forum index >> TeamHB discussions >> Hot matches next week Goto page : 1, 2