GE Q&A session
Forum index >> TeamHB discussions >> GE Q&A session Goto page : 1, 2, 3 ... 15, 16, 17
 
Posted on 2010-09-29 14:50:12
skulo
Posts: 428
Do use players "off the ball" skill when they play in "defesive formation"?When they are in defense they havent ball so?


Edit by Admin:
This is a tough one. If we take your question literally, then yes, they do use it when they are still considered to be in a defensive formation.
But to answer what you probably wanted to know. Normally (probably something like 99.9% of the time) a defensive player doesn't use off the ball - which is also stated in the FAQ.

Posted on 2010-09-30 11:58:08
Odula
Posts: 8707
In some of my friendlies I used 2 formations to play, usually 1st 0-15 mins, then 2nd 16-45 and for the last 15 minutes again the 1st one. Majority of my players is ice-cold. The opponent played the same guys all the time.

Taking into the account low stamina of my and opponent players I would expect much better performance of my 1st formation in the last 15 minutes in comparison to the first quarter. Am I missing something here or is the influence implemented only based on match time or is it based on the time spend on the field? The difference should be 10 percent for the players with stamina 5 based on the FAQ.


Edit by Admin.
I'm not 100% sure what you are asking but here goes.
As the player plays he loses energy. If you put that player out and return him for the last minutes he will play with as much energy as he had when you put him out - players don't "rest" while they are on the bench (although maybe that would be an interesting upgrade of the GE ).

That last 10 minutes "under pressure stuff" is implemented only if the game is close (or is a cup game). It influences only crucial decisions - not everything that happens on the field.

I hope this answers what you wanted to know


Reflects exactly the grey area, thanks a lot.

Posted on 2010-10-02 1:14:33
Hovvner
Posts: 0
I gotta a bit strange feeling I saw it somewhere, so just need a confirmation (or no if I'm wrong).

Concidering the set of skills used by a player on certain position/tactics.
So you have those 'let's say' 3-4 specific skills for a specific position, do they all have the same value? (Do they all have the same multiplier?)

To sum this question with an example: let's concider a situation with player A and B, they are 100% skill similiar if not counting the fact that:
1) Player A has 15 shooting and 10 jumping
2) Player B has 10 shooting and 15 jumping

Which one will play better as a LB/RB?

Edit by Admin:
As stated, we're not going to tell you which skills are for what.
But in your example it depends on the attacking style and the direction of your attack. If you intend to "attack" through that area than you would probably be better off with Player A

Posted on 2010-10-04 18:59:31
Hovvner
Posts: 0
Is there any 'home advantage' (playing at your ground)? If yes, how does it work - slightly more chances, higher posession?

Yes, home advantage is a part of the game. It gives the home players a bit of a "boost" on their stats
Last edited on 2010-10-06 at 10:56

Posted on 2010-10-06 10:26:01
Artoupan
Posts: 0
Hi,

You said us that GK need these four skills : One on One, Reflexes, Agility and Technique.

No Admin ever stated that GKs use exactly the above skills

But do they use sometimes others skills, like Ball Control, Passing, Off the Ball, Speed, Jumping ? Or their height ?

(I understand you don't want to give us specific details about what skills are used, just want to know if other skills than the four ones you told us could be usefull)

Thanks a lot

Yes, goalkeepers do use other skills besides those normally associated with goalkeeping

Posted on 2010-10-06 18:29:00
Hovvner
Posts: 0
Is it like that, that you need a whole set of skills to deal with all in-game situations in 1 formation, or you can deal with all of them with just a few abilities?

Edit by Admin:
If you play 1 formation only you can get away with not using a few of the skills.
Last edited on 2010-10-07 at 10:52

Posted on 2010-10-07 0:06:50
simon_stof
Posts: 229
Is 3-3 defens not the best against jump shot?

After my cup cup game today I relly thinking of leaving the game. My first half I play 3-3 defens and I lost that one with 8 second half I play 5-1 defens and I won that by 6 goals. What is the tacktik good for if we can't trust what formation is good to use against jump and also with the other ones.


Edit by Admin;
3-3 is the best defence against jump shot, BUT you need players to play 3-3, because if you don't, it's worse than if you played 6-0, with correctly positioned defenders, against jump shot

Anyways, onwards to your team. First thing that I checked is your forward defenders. FDs need to be the best of your defenders - from physical and technical (and with technical I don't mean technique - just so that there won't be any misunderstandings) point of view. Only one of your FDs fits that bill. That would mean that you played with 2 players that were "out of position" so to speak.

Player wise (looking at the stats) you should have a slight advantage which apparently you did once the defenders were set better.

Posted on 2010-10-07 12:13:52
Draugr
Posts: 712
3-3 defense works. Some people have figured it out, so apparently, it isnt impossible. I dont know everything about all tactics, in fact, I dont know all about any tactic (including jump shot) but so far, every tactic, offensive or defensive, that I studied, Ive found use for. I have no reason to believe other than that the tactics are in fact well arranged, and I'll have an issue choosing which three to pick. Thats not to say all tactics are 100% equal, but each has situations where its superior to any other tactic amongst those I looked at.

Admins, please keep in mind that when you say specific information that requires knowledge about the stats of players to be of help, this gives help only to the person owning those players (and theoretically, the NT coach who can also see it). Others would have to pay for this information. Therefore, when you want to give such kind of help, you ought to consider revealing the players in question so everyone gets the same knowledge.

Posted on 2010-10-07 14:16:41
[THB] Admin
Posts: 936
Draugr wrote:

Admins, please keep in mind that when you say specific information that requires knowledge about the stats of players to be of help, this gives help only to the person owning those players (and theoretically, the NT coach who can also see it). Others would have to pay for this information. Therefore, when you want to give such kind of help, you ought to consider revealing the players in question so everyone gets the same knowledge.

Yes you are right. I'll edit the first post to add, that player stats can be shown here if you ask for direct examples from the game.
So from now on, anyone that asks a question with a direct example from the game, can find his players stats visible to everyone.

Posted on 2010-10-07 15:47:18
simon_stof
Posts: 229
simon_stof wrote:

Is 3-3 defens not the best against jump shot?

After my cup cup game today I relly thinking of leaving the game. My first half I play 3-3 defens and I lost that one with 8 second half I play 5-1 defens and I won that by 6 goals. What is the tacktik good for if we can't trust what formation is good to use against jump and also with the other ones.


Edit by Admin;
3-3 is the best defence against jump shot, BUT you need players to play 3-3, because if you don't, it's worse than if you played 6-0, with correctly positioned defenders, against jump shot

Anyways, onwards to your team. First thing that I checked is your forward defenders. FDs need to be the best of your defenders - from physical and technical (and with technical I don't mean technique - just so that there won't be any misunderstandings) point of view. Only one of your FDs fits that bill. That would mean that you played with 2 players that were "out of position" so to speak.

Player wise (looking at the stats) you should have a slight advantage which apparently you did once the defenders were set better.



I can't get help about who of my fd who was placed at the right position?
and what two there where wrong because I still don't understand it. It looks like two of them has the same rating.
Forum index >> TeamHB discussions >> GE Q&A session Goto page : 1, 2, 3 ... 15, 16, 17